|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
a MRC Human
Biochemical Genetics Unit, University College London, Wolfson House,
4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, UK, b Institute
of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK, c Department of
Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, Great
Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK
Correspondence to: Professor Edwards.
Received 1 July
1998;
Revised version accepted for publication 19 November 1998
Sacral agenesis is a heterogeneous group of congenital
anomalies in which most cases are sporadic but rare familial forms also
occur. Although one gene has been mapped to chromosome 7q36 in families
with hemisacrum, associated with anorectal atresia and presacral mass,
it is clear that the genetic aetiology of these disorders is complex
and other genes remain to be discovered. Some years ago, the idea of T
(Brachyury) as a candidate gene for sacral
agenesis was raised, because tail abnormalities associated with T and
the t complex, on mouse chromosome 17, resemble spinal defects seen in
man. The recent cloning and mapping of the human T gene prompted us to
re-evaluate this idea. T is a transcription factor essential for the
normal development of posterior mesodermal structures. Although the
sequence and function of T are highly conserved in evolution, our
genetic study shows that the coding region of the human gene is highly
polymorphic. Three common variable amino acid sites in known functional
domains have been identified: Gly356Ser, Asn369Ser, and Gly177Asp. For
the latter variant, functional studies have shown that the presence of
Asp at residue 177 reduces the stability of T dimer formation. A search
for rare mutation of T in 28 selected patients with sacral
agenesis/anorectal atresia identified a novel, rare variant in one
patient and her mother. This mutation leads to an amino acid change
within a conserved activation domain. While the functional significance
of this single mutation requires further investigation, we can conclude
from our studies that if T has a role in the aetiology of sacral
agenesis, its contribution is small in this particular set of patients. However, we cannot exclude a more major role in other forms of sacral defect.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |