J Med Genet

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tomlinson, I P M
Right arrow Articles by Houlston, R S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tomlinson, I P M
Right arrow Articles by Houlston, R S
J Med Genet 2001;38:81-85 ( February )

Review article

Two hits revisited again I P M Tomlinsona, R Roylancea, R S Houlstonb

a Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, UK, b Section of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Cancer Research, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK

Correspondence to: Dr Tomlinson, i.tomlinson{at}icrf.icnet.uk

INTRODUCTION AND METHODS---Since the concept of the "two hit hypothesis" was introduced over 20 years ago, a wealth of genetic data has accumulated on the mutations found at tumour suppressor loci. Perhaps surprisingly, these data conceal large gaps in our knowledge which genetic and functional studies are beginning to uncover. The "two hit hypothesis" must be updated to take account of this new information.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION---Here, we discuss both the results of recent studies and some of the questions that they highlight. In particular, how valid are conclusions from inherited Mendelian syndromes when applied to sporadic cancers? Why is allelic loss so common and how does it occur? Are the "two hits" random or interdependent? Is abolition of protein function always optimal for tumorigenesis? Can "third hits" occur and, if so, why? How can mismatch repair deficiency and the methylator phenotype be incorporated into the "two hit" hypothesis? We suggest that the "two hit hypothesis" is not fixed but is evolving as our knowledge expands.


Keywords: two hit model; tumour suppressor; carcinogenesis


© 2001 by J Med Genet



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
M Clendenning, L Senter, H Hampel, K L. Robinson, S Sun, D Buchanan, M D Walsh, M Nilbert, J Green, J Potter, et al.
A frame-shift mutation of PMS2 is a widespread cause of Lynch syndrome
J. Med. Genet., June 1, 2008; 45(6): 340 - 345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. Cybulski, B. Gorski, T. Debniak, B. Gliniewicz, M. Mierzejewski, B. Masojc, A. Jakubowska, J. Matyjasik, E. Zlowocka, A. Sikorski, et al.
NBS1 Is a Prostate Cancer Susceptibility Gene
Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 64(4): 1215 - 1219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. M. Shattuck, J. Costa, M. Bernstein, R. T. Jensen, D. C. Chung, and A. Arnold
Mutational Analysis of Smad3, a Candidate Tumor Suppressor Implicated in TGF-{beta} and Menin Pathways, in Parathyroid Adenomas and Enteropancreatic Endocrine Tumors
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2002; 87(8): 3911 - 3914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. P. Cheadle, M. Krawczak, M. W. Thomas, A. K. Hodges, N. Al-Tassan, N. Fleming, and J. R. Sampson
Different Combinations of Biallelic APC Mutation Confer Different Growth Advantages in Colorectal Tumours
Cancer Res., January 1, 2002; 62(2): 363 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.